RE: 10.2 listener won't start on same port as 9.2 listener

From: Goulet, Dick <DGoulet_at_vicr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:36:53 -0400
Message-ID: <4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA6502C8C163@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com>

Humm, Did that too, but without problems.

From: Richard Ji [mailto:richard.c.ji_at_gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:34 PM To: Goulet, Dick
Cc: MGogala_at_allegientsystems.com; JayMiller_at_tdwaterhouse.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: 10.2 listener won't start on same port as 9.2 listener

It's backward compatible but not without problems some times. I ran into
a problem using 9i listener for a 8.1.7.4 DB where it start to run out of file
descriptors. Revert back to 8i listener solved the problem. So I had to
run two listeners.

Regards

Richard

On 9/21/05, Goulet, Dick <DGoulet_at_vicr.com> wrote:

The advice I got from OTS some years ago, like with the release of 8.0, was to use one listener for all databases on a single server, just use the latest listener installed as they were backwards compatible. That advice has been working extremely well ever since. So my question would be why do you want a separate listener, unless you've got two or more IP addresses, and consequently NIC's, for one server?

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Gogala, Mladen

	Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:20 AM
	To: 'JayMiller_at_TDWaterhouse.com'; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
	Subject: RE: 10.2 listener won't start on same port as 9.2

listener

Oracle is, quite obviously, listening to my advice, even if some listers are not.

Mladen Gogala

Ext. 121

From: JayMiller_at_TDWaterhouse.com [mailto: JayMiller_at_TDWaterhouse.com <mailto:JayMiller_at_TDWaterhouse.com> ]

	Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 6:07 PM
	To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
	Subject: RE: 10.2 listener won't start on same port as 9.2

listener

Well, I just got the answer from Oracle and apparently 10.2 is purposely not allowing you to do this any more. It was done as a fix for another bug and this behavior will be backported to earlier versions in future releases.

Looks like we're going to have to go with a single listener, like it or not.

Sigh.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:39:16 CDT