Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released

From: rjamya <rjamya_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:03:47 -0400
Message-ID: <9177895d050831080317161df4@mail.gmail.com>

Wel also rolled back 9206 to 9204 in 3 days. It consistentely failed on one query which had a decode on static (non column) values. Since it would have taken us more time to prepare a test case, we decided to roll back the patch.

Raj

On 8/31/05, oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> wrote:
>
> >> Special mention of my black list:
> 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6> with RAC (first time I had to roleback a
> patchset!).<<
> [rollback]
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Aug 31 2005 - 10:07:15 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Niall Litchfield: "Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released"
Previous message: rjamya: "Re: Ouch - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17175], [255], [], [], [], [], [], []"
In reply to: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org: "RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released"
Next in thread: Murching, Bob: "RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US