Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM

From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala_at_allegientsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:05:10 -0400
Message-ID: <42FA0996.7000009@allegientsystems.com>

Sriram Kumar wrote:

>Hi Tanel,
>
>Good that it becomes a hidden parameter in 10g. The bug number that
>was given to me was 4008013 but was not table to see the bug details.
>
>

Your search returned no hits!

The combination of key words and attributes you were searching for did not retrieve any results.

This bug is probably under double secret probation by dean Wormer.

-- 
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Ext. 121


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Aug 10 2005 - 09:13:12 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org: "RE: Does anyone run test win vs. linux and can share how muchfaster is linux than windows, please?"
Previous message: tdisanto_at_aecrealty.com: "RE: Auditing Oracle business processes?"
In reply to: Sriram Kumar: "Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM"
Next in thread: scott.hutchinson_at_interact-analysis.com: "Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US