Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Question regarding db_file_scattered_read

Re: Question regarding db_file_scattered_read

From: Dennis Williams <oracledba.williams_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 08:40:44 -0500
Message-ID: <de807caa050718064050cee78d@mail.gmail.com>


George,

    George, congratulations on thinking ahead, anticipating problems before your users encounter them. Of course, you'll get no credit from management, but such is the DBA's lot.

    In Oracle terms, db_file_scattered_read usually equates to a full table scan. Start looking for queries that are executing a full table scan. Following Pareto's rule (80/20 principle), you probably have a few queries that are doing a FTS on your largest tables. Tame them and your system performance should look better.

Dennis Williams

On 7/18/05, Johnson, George <GJohnson_at_gam.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I have a DB on a Solaris box, the system that is almost at 100%
> utilisation, I'm not overly worried as no one is complaining, yet. I am
> simply trying to identify where the resources are being consumed, partly
> curiosity and partly in the hope of preventing a potential future problem.
>
> I have been over the wait stats and found that the system spends
> it's time, almost exclusively, making users wait on db_file_scattered_read,
> about 30% of their session time, in fact. However the OS reports hardly any
> I/O wait time, the system resources are being used up by user CPU. I believe
> the entire SGA is little too small, I am wondering if the scattered_read
> waits are a result of the SGA and/or buffer cache being too small or would a
> buffer cache that is too small, more likely result in buffer_busy_waits or
> have I got my thinking completely backside-about-face!? All the notes I can
> find relate db_file_scattered_read to an I/O performance problem, which from
> what I can tell from the OS, I don't seem to have.
>
> Any pointers in the direction I should start off in next, would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Rgds
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only
> for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
> you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
> this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
> late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
> accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
> If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
> This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
> be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
> related financial instruments.
> GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
> regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
> ****************************************************************************
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Jul 18 2005 - 08:42:44 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US