Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: How's this for space saving:
I've seen the same on occasion (in 9.2.0.4 at least). On a related note, the values Oracle gets for OPT_CMPR_COUNT have (in my limited experience and testing) always been correct (i.e. if I try to compress more the index starts growing again). Anyone have experiences to the contrary ?
mvg/regards
Jo
"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.d To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> emon.co.uk> cc: Sent by: Subject: How's this for space saving: oracle-l-bounce_at_fr eelists.org 07/13/2005 17:07 Please respond to jonathan
Validate index XXX;
select opt_cmpr_count, opt_compr_pctsave from index_stats;
OPT_CMPR_COUNT OPT_COMPR_PCTSAVE
-------------- -----------------
3 233
So if I compress this index, I can reduce it's space usage by 233% ! (And I've only just created it at pctfree = 10 - so that's not because of current empty space).
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
Now waiting on the publishers: Cost Based Oracle - Volume 1
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/appearances.html Public Appearances - schedule updated 8th July 2005
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jul 13 2005 - 10:50:30 CDT
![]() |
![]() |