Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: a really non-technical question, help?

RE: a really non-technical question, help?

From: Ron Rogers <RROGERS_at_galottery.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:26:44 -0400
Message-Id: <s2b823be.086@glcclst_gw.galottery.org>


Ron
 If the DataGuard server is open in the read-only mode it must be licensed. I believe the inactive stand-by does not need licensing unless active for more than 10 days a year. Ron

>>> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org 06/21/05 1:47 PM >>>
Oracle sales told me we need to license the DataGuard servers just like prod servers. I think the reasoning is there are active transactions occuring, but I'm not sure about this.



Ron Reidy
Lead DBA
Array BioPharma, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Kevin Closson Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:45 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: a really non-technical question, help?  

sorry, folks, but I though as many production DBAs as are on this list, I might be able to get an answer to this question. What I need to know is how Oracle licensing works on a hot-standby (e.g., a VCS failover node).

In this case I'm thinking that the failover node will never be running oracle *unless* the primary is dead. Seems like a single system worht of CPUs to license in my mind...any feedback ?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Ron Rogers
>Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:27 AM
>To: jrsmiley_at_gmail.com; richard.ignizio_at_paetec.com;
>rgramolini_at_tax.state.vt.us
>Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>Subject: RE: RMAN backups
>
>Ruth,
> You are correct. a level 0 backup for me takes 14 min at 10.4
>Gig disk used and the level1 backups takes 14 min at 3.7 Gig.
>Ron
>
>>>> "Ruth Gramolini" <rgramolini_at_tax.state.vt.us> 06/21/05 1:05 PM >>>
>John,
>
>Unless something has changed with 10g, and incremental backup
>doesn't actually save much time. Rman still has to read the
>block headers to see if the block needs to be backed up. It
>mostly saves space on disc if backing up to disk.
>
>Correct me if I am wrong!
>Ruth
>-----Original Message-----
>From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On
>Behalf Of John Smiley
>Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 11:19 AM
>To: richard.ignizio_at_paetec.com
>Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>Subject: Re: RMAN backups
>
>
>Backup times with RMAN are going to vary greatly depending
>upon the hardware and how many blocks need to be backed up.
>Even a very large database can be backed up incrementally if
>very few blocks have changed since the last backup with RMAN.
>
>What might be a better yardstick is backup rate. The fastest
>RMAN backup rate I've seen was published by Amazon a few years
>back. They attained 2TB / hour.
>
>John Smiley
>Technical Management Consultant
>TUSC, Inc.
>
>--
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l 

This electronic message transmission is a PRIVATE communication which contains
information which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended 
to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the
sender  of the delivery error by replying to this message, or notify us by
telephone (877-633-2436, ext. 0), and then delete it from your system.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Jun 21 2005 - 14:32:24 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US