Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Tim Gorman's "...Cost-Based Optimizer.doc"

RE: Tim Gorman's "...Cost-Based Optimizer.doc"

From: Goulet, Dick <DGoulet_at_vicr.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:05:20 -0400
Message-ID: <4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA6502988A75@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com>


Wolfgang,

        That's probably an absolute truth. But I can guarantee you that it rules when working with the data dictionary.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Wolfgang Breitling [mailto:breitliw_at_centrexcc.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 1:59 PM
To: Goulet, Dick
Cc: somckit.khemmanivanh_at_weyerhaeuser.com; cmarquez_at_collegeboard.org; mgogala_at_allegientsystems.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Tim Gorman's "...Cost-Based Optimizer.doc"

Could that be that many systems, especially in COTS, were designed and=20 written at a time when the RBO "ruled" and therefore the design and the=20 sql are tuned around the RBO?

Goulet, Dick wrote:

> What really gets to me with the CBO is that often a simple /*+ RULE */
> does the trick=3D20

>=20

--=20
Regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 16 2005 - 14:10:30 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US