Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Variable where clause
It is not readily apparent that this method is applicable to the =
problem, and I deleted the original message. Variable where clauses can =
be handled through sys_context. See =
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=3D4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:1288=
401763279
Ian MacGregor
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
ian_at_slac.stanford.edu=20
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Ranko Mosic
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 6:22 PM
To: Jared Still
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Variable where clause
Thanks Jared,=3D20
I like second option because it is black box approach -there are no 3
separate signatures as with orerloaded stuff.
I think actually I will do compbination of the first and third
suggestion - first check which parameters I got, then build sql. It
can be done quite easily now with
this execute immediate stuff.=3D20
Thanks again.=3D20
PS Hope book is selling well.=3D20
On 6/14/05, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The first thing that comes to mind is a package
> with 3 overloaded procedures, one for each set
> of input parameters.
>=3D20
>=3D20
>=3D20
>=3D20
>=3D20
>=3D20
>=3D20
>=3D20 >=3D20
>=3D20 >=3D20 >=3D20
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jun 14 2005 - 23:56:51 CDT
![]() |
![]() |