RE: Oracle RAC cost justification?

From: Hollis, Les <Les.Hollis_at_ps.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:28:24 -0500
Message-ID: <683E0A1C82D75246BD9F4E01F77CBB0F843D17@pscdalpexch02.perotsystems.net>

Geez guys 28 emails about this subject.....think it's beaten to death by now....

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jared Still Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:58 PM
To: Carel-Jan Engel
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Oracle RAC cost justification?

On 6/2/05, Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl> wrote:
>=20

> On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 00:01, Jared Still wrote:=20

>=20

> *> I agree it could still be a SPOF but it certainly is redundant component=20

> > wise...

>=20

> SANs will and do fail.*

>=20

>  Oh yes, they do fail. Don't get me started.......

>=20
>=20

Well, why not. :)

Tell us about a SAN failure you can discuss.

I've experienced some, but a public forum is not a good place for me to vent about it.

--=20
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Jun 02 2005 - 19:30:32 CDT