Re: Opatch rant

Well, I've already posted one issue with 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6> to this list as well. It wasn't a big one, but it sure had everybody here pulling their hair out until we found the fix.
But, applying 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6> got the auditors off my back for awhile and I'd rather troubleshoot an Oracle issue than deal with an auditor any day.

Robyn

On 5/20/05, Mladen Gogala <mgogala_at_allegientsystems.com> wrote:
>
> Robyn wrote:
>
> >Fortunately, it's relatively easy to get the perl
> >module back in place and after that, I went to 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6> <
> http://9.2.0.6> and
> >haven't had to mess with opatch since.
> >
> >Robyn
> >
> >
> I am not going to express my feelings about the 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6>yet again. I
> opened my
> heart and my foul mouth to this list many times so the most of you know
> how do I
> feel about [EXPLETIVE DELETED BY MORAL MAJORITY] 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6>patchset.
> Does anybody have any idea when is 9.2.0.7 <http://9.2.0.7> coming out?
> Will it be
> another customer
> based beta testing (CBBT for short) or a real, usable release?
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
> Ext. 121
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l