RE: LOCALLY MANAGED EXTENT PERFORMANCE

From: Wolfson Larry - lwolfs <lawrence.wolfson_at_acxiom.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:55:21 -0500
Message-ID: <B39B7B7D8C8CEA419D0ED45FD7FA4C5347CC79@CWYMSX06.Corp.Acxiom.net>

And I thought Oracle said you didn't have to worry about how many any more.

        I didn't exactly blame LMTs I just said there were a lot of extents.

        Not my app.

        Thanks for info         

-----Original Message-----

From: Dogan, Ibrahim - Ibrahim [mailto:Ibrahim.Dogan_at_Lowes.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:46 PM
To: Wolfson Larry - lwolfs; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED EXTENT PERFORMANCE

Do not use uniform sized LMTs for volatile tables since you may end up having a table/index with thousand of extents..

More important, don't blame LMTs for it..

If you use AUTO extent allocation instead of uniform size, you won't have problem...

Thanks,  

Ibrahim DOGAN
Sr. Sybase/Oracle DBA
www.lowes.com

---

The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system. Thank You.

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Sat Apr 23 2005 - 01:03:03 CDT