Re: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA

From: mhthomas <qnxodba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:53:03 -0400
Message-ID: <d6bad08005042211535baa5c89@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/22/05, Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR) <thomas.mercadante_at_labor.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Wait a minute. You say that they *do* regression testing? Are you sure?
> Have you seen the list of bugs?

>=20
> Maybe they only do *gression* testing -=20

Typo? Did you mean "reguessing testing".=20

Sorry, its Friday. ;-)

Regards,

Mike Thomas

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Apr 22 2005 - 14:57:15 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: jungwolf: "Re: brutally simple question - number of triggers on a table"
Previous message: Scott Stefick: "Re: Reports Server Configuration"
In reply to: Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR): "RE: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA"
Next in thread: Post, Ethan: "RE: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US