RE: sqlldr unrecoverable clause and archive_log

8.1.7

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Drake [mailto:bdbafh_at_gmail.com] Sent: 18 April 2005 16:09
To: jdunn_at_sefas.com
Subject: Re: sqlldr unrecoverable clause and archive_log

version?

On 4/18/05, John Dunn <jdunn_at_sefas.com> wrote:
> Can someone please explain what redo is generated by sqlldr direct path
> when unrecoverable is specified but archive logging is on. The sqlldr
> documentation seems to suggest that the amount of redo generated depends
> upon whether archive logging in set on or not.
>
> I have a scenerio where a sqlldr directp path load is taking far longer on
a
> system with archive logging set on then one where archive logging is
> on...could archive logging be the problem?
>
> John
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>

--
#/etc/init.d/init.cssd stop
# f=ma, divide by 1, convert to moles.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l