Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Universal database interface?
Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On 04/12/2005 08:11:41 PM, Jared Still wrote:
>
>
>>---- >>"Many developers are happy to trade runtime performance for cross-platfor=
>>portability." >>=20 >>Maybe the developers are happy, because performance is the DBA's problem,=
>>right? >>----
So if you're developers are duvhelopers then you must be hanging out with the wrong crowd!
>
> Spoken like a true architect! I welcome the standards and "database
> independent applications". Those are the things that enable me to earn
> my salary. Here is the law of Mladen: application that starts as a
> database independent will have to become Oracle specific in order to
> achieve an acceptable level of performance. My favorite toys are
> Object-Relational Mappers (ORM), recently a genuine hit among Java
> duhveleopers. Allegedly, they'll transform a relational query into a
> Java object which will then be passed through BZZZTYIKL or some other
> abbreviation resembling Vogon poetry, which will do an indescribable
> magic and, in particular, generate an acceptable user interface. To
> attain sub-hour web response, I ended up writing a ton of PL/SQL
> procedures implementing those "queries". When application was finished,
> it was database independent, provided that the database was supporting
> PL/SQL, external tables, BFILE fields, function based indexes and
> UTL_SMTP package. That is my kind of unified approach and my kind of
> database independence!
>
> --=20
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
-- Radu-Adrian Popescu CSA, DBA, Developer Aldrapay MD Aldratech Ltd. +40213212243 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Apr 15 2005 - 00:32:39 CDT
![]() |
![]() |