Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: ** install of 9206
Rafiq,
If the user is venturing off into one-off patch-land (evil pipe organ music in the background)... why not test the more recent one-off patchset?
I would shy away from any one-offs not required (per the usual boilerplate warning in the readme.txt) unless this is in response to a bug that you have encountered or a security alert.
"# WARNING: Failure to carefully read and understand these requirements may
# result in your applying a patch that can cause your Oracle Server to # malfunction, including interruption of service and/or loss of data. # # If you do not meet all of the following requirements, please log an # iTAR, so that an Oracle support analyst may review your situation. The # Oracle analyst will help you determine if this patch is suitable for you # to apply to your system. We recommend that you avoid applying any # temporary patch unless directed by an Oracle Support Analyst who has # reviewed your system and determined that it is applicable. "
I haven't heard anything about an expected release date of the 9.2.0.7 patchset ... perhaps April 15?
Paul
Patch 4065410
ORACLE 9I 9.2.0.6 PATCH 1 FOR WINDOWS NT, 2000 , XP AND 2003(32 BIT)
Patch 4156468
ORACLE 9I 9.2.0.6 PATCH 2 FOR WINDOWS NT, 2000 , XP AND 2003(32 BIT)
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:09:20 -0500, Mohammad Rafiq <rafiq9857_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Joshi,
>
> If on Windows look for patch 4065410 after applying 9206. This is a
> bugs fixed patch introduced in 9206.
>
> Regards
> Rafiq
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:52:32 -0800 (PST), A Joshi <ajoshi977_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I need to install 9206 from scratch. I assume the steps will be :
> > 1) Install 9201
> > 2) Apply 9206 patchset.
> > Is it correct? Thanks for your help.
-- #/etc/init.d/init.cssd stop -- f=ma, divide by 1, convert to moles. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Mar 29 2005 - 11:17:55 CST
![]() |
![]() |