Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Shared pool from 8i to 9i
When we moved from 32 bit to 64 bit we had to triple the size of our shared
pool to handle the same workload and 04031 errors are still a problem if we
do not bounce our instances every couple of weeks.
HTH -- Mark D Powell --
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Kline.Michael
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:49 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Shared pool from 8i to 9i
I converted hpux 8.1.7.4 to Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production.
Shared pool was originally around 80M and never had any problems for over a year.
I got a memory error, and then we upped it to 100M, then 160M, and finally 400M.
ALTER SYSTEM SET shared_pool_size=400M SCOPE=BOTH;
Is this typical?
I start getting a lot of:
Thu Jan 20 06:24:13 2005
Errors in file /u001/app/oracle/admin/DPFRPT/bdump/dpfrpt_cjq0_7146.trc:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-01003: no statement parsed
And
There are 722 memory allocation errors for object-level stat
in the last 15 minutes
There are 13884 memory allocation errors for object-level stat
in the last 15 minutes
There are 8339 memory allocation errors for object-level stat
in the last 15 minutes
Mon Jan 10 06:00:16 2005
Michael Kline
Database Administration
SunTrust Technology Center
1030 Wilmer Avenue
Richmond, Virginia 23227
Outside 804.261.9446
STNet 643.9446
Cell 804.744.1545
<mailto:michael.kline_at_suntrust.com> michael.kline_at_suntrust.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Jan 21 2005 - 11:15:03 CST
![]() |
![]() |