Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Sorbanes Oxley for dummies? -- more questions
It is my reading of SOX that what is and is not acceptable is totally up to
the auditors. The provision (section 440?) of SOX that is causing all the
work is actually only one paragraph long and is not very specific. As such
it is up to the courts to determine what it means. That has yet to happen.
As such if the auditors say your books are OK and the CFO and CEO are
willing to put their names on the bottom line you could in fact do nothing
new.
But after what happened to Andersen most auditors are in cover their behind mode. Some of the requirements being placed on companies are just not practical or useful. There is a court case saying that the government went to far in their actions against Andersen. Depending on how it comes out there could be a major shift in where auditors put their emphasis. Unfortunately for most of us auditors make money on the current process so you can expect the worse.
What the act definitely requires is that a firm take steps to protect the integrity of its data. You must have written procedures for updating production data and proof that you follow them (paper trail). Right now what constitutes valid procedures is whatever the auditor says.
IMHO -- Mark D Powell --
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Hemant K Chitale
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 9:49 AM
To: bdbafh_at_gmail.com; Michael.Kline_at_suntrust.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Sorbanes Oxley for dummies? -- more questions
Not having read the book , but I, too, have a number of questions. My
current
employer, being NASDAQ listed, is also undergoing preparation for a SOX
Audit in 2005.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Jan 14 2005 - 09:45:46 CST
![]() |
![]() |