Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Drilling down on the data
Hi,
We have one table which contains the information about the batches and the heirarchy of the batches.
On these batches certain operation are performed and as there are no similary in the operations, every operation results are stored in a table, so if we have 9 operations then these 9 operations goes in 9 tables.
The table structures are as follows:
Product_batch ( table)
Batch_no Parent_batch Attri1 Attri2 1 Null Xyx abc 2 1 aaaa saaa 3 2 aaaa 344 Observation1(Table) Batch obs1 obs2 1 123 124 Observation2 (table) batch obs3 obs4 2 345 456 Observation3 batch obs3 obs4 3 result result
Now to come to know about the tests performed on a batch and it`s parents how can we proceed? As from the batch I can`t come to know about the table in which the results are lying...(can be 1,2 or 3) eg. If I wanted to know the results of batch 3 and it`s parents(2 and 1) how can I go to the table 3 to pick the observation, then for it`s parent which is 2 go to obseravation2 and get the results and so on and then finally give the result...
Does anyone have came across with this kind of problem?
TIA Regards
Sanjay
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of Jonathan Lewis
Sent: Mon 12/27/2004 11:11 PM
To: oracle-l
Subject: Re: Materialize hint
In reverse order, the "with" clause names and defines a subquery before its use in a query - a bit like a macro in C.
Unlike C macros though, the optimizer can choose to write your subquery in-line and then optimise the expanded statement, or create a temporary table from the definition and use the temporary table for the main query.
You can choose to use the 'with' clause simply to make a complex SQL statement tidier, knowing that there should be no performance benefit in creating a temporary table.
If you want to control the optimiser, then the 'materialize' hint makes it create a temporary table; the 'inline' hint makes it perform 'macrosubstitution'.
As far as I know, neither hint is documented.
The 'with' clause (known as subquery factoring) is quite flexible - though not yet as flexible as DB2's which can cope with recursive definitions). Here's an example I wrote to answer a fun puzzle that Daniel Morgan put out on cdo.server some months ago.
with age_list as (
select rownum age
from all_objects
where rownum <= 36
),
product_check as (
select
age1.age as youngest, age2.age as middle, age3.age as oldest, age1.age + age2.age +age3.age as summedfrom
age_list age1, age_list age2, age_list age3
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Public Appearances - schedule updated Dec 23rd 2004
I recently ran accross a SQL by Jonathan that uses "materialize" hint. As was unable to find the hint documented anywhere, and God knows I tried before asking the question, I must ask the folowing two =20 questions:
This question is, of course, meant for Jonathan but I'd appreciate anybody else's answer as well.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or Mailadmin_at_wipro.com immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Dec 29 2004 - 23:47:08 CST
![]() |
![]() |