Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Which one is good in terms of performance

Re: Which one is good in terms of performance

From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:46:24 -0700
Message-ID: <41CC39D0.9050505@centrexcc.com>


Thanks Tim, very thorough and detailed work as usual. I am of course pleased to see my opinion confirmed, obtained from casual observation but not hardened by rigorous testing, that you can get away with a rather low sampling rates for table statistics without sacrificing much in accuracy, but the same is not true for index statistics and histograms and that one should therefore separate the gathering of table statistics (including basic column statistics "for all columns size 1") from index statistics and histograms. Unless you can afford a full table compute.

Tim Gorman wrote:
> Seema and Wolfgang,
> Here is some info I generated recently, to add to the discussion...
>
> My apologies for the length of the post, but feel free to delete if not
> interested...
>
>

-- 
Regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Dec 24 2004 - 09:43:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US