RE: Storage array advice anyone?

From: Hostetter, Jay M <JHostetter_at_decommunications.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:58:38 -0500
Message-ID: <D67EB7CEECD4334F9C85759227553BBC919580@CL-EXCHANGE1.dande.com>

We used to call this centralized setup a "mainframe."=20

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Martic Zoran Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 9:44 AM
To: Oracle-L
Subject: Re: Storage array advice anyone?

Is that not similar to what Oracle (Larry E) wants on the database level, to centralize everything into one piece and just average everything across that one piece hoping that with some resource manager/smart logic you can force some inequality?

Is that not as what UNIX/Linux/NT is doing with CPU's?

It only looks that the storage piece is still not that mature in global. Or I missed something?

Regards,
Zoran Martic

Matthew Zito <mzito_at_gridapp.com> wrote:

**DISCLAIMER

This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the =
use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain=
 information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If you are n=
ot the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the =
message or any information contained in the message. If you have received t=
his communication in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail=
 message. The contents do not represent the opinion of D&E except to the ex=

tent that it relates to their official business.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Dec 17 2004 - 08:54:45 CST