Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes

Re: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes

From: David Sharples <davidsharples_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:48:04 +0000
Message-ID: <be592d5504121311481f629d87@mail.gmail.com>


what if you have 1000's of people trying to access the table data at the same time? Splitting the indexes and tables wont help because there will always be contention at the disk level, not the tablespace level. The goal being make the number of io's being as small as possible

The point is for a single session, splitting wont help you because they are accessed serially - and that scales up as well

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:41:52 -0600, Knight, Jon <jknight_at_concordefs.com> wrote:
> Sorry if I missed this already, but ...
>
> Say session A has already read the index and is doing some datafile access,
> when along comes session B with an index range scan. My understanding is
> that there's only one read/write head on the disk and contention results.
> Of course 10s or 100s of sessions would compound the issue. Is this
> reasoning flawed?
>
> Thanks,
> Jon Knight

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Dec 13 2004 - 13:43:30 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US