RE: automatic undo 100% used

From: Gogala, Mladen <MGogala_at_allegientsystems.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:59:25 -0500
Message-ID: <D42C14B2E3F2B74DB41D5B6B2E2B992F01931F89@pegasus.lawaudit.com>

Your logic would push storage manufacturers into recession. Don't you have any compassion for the poor workers in India and Malaysia? You are supposed to buy more disks and not ask any questions.
--

Mladen Gogala
Ext. 121

-----Original Message-----

From: Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us [mailto:Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:16 PM
To: davidsharples_at_gmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: automatic undo 100% used

Have 3Gb allocated for undo retention, a few batch processes and tablespace is showing 100% full. Is this normal behavior? I am used to old rollback segments where it would be and likely revolve around poorly written batch processes.
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Mon Dec 13 2004 - 12:57:27 CST