Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: log file sequential read - arguments P3
Carry,
I think we can do it with tusc on HP-UX. Or even easier... I just got an idea that knowing size of my redo logs I can check what is the biggest value for P2, which is the offset. I'll check it tomorrow.
Thanks,
Alex
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:17:52 -0600, Cary Millsap <cary.millsap_at_hotsos.com> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> One way to find out for certain is to truss (strace, ktrace, tusc,
> whatever...) an Oracle kernel that logs time to the event--on a test =
> system.
> In the truss output, you'll be able to see the exact size of the read =
> calls.
>
> Sometimes, even when the manual appears to document something =
> completely,
> you find that it's possible to understand things a little more =
> thoroughly
> than the even the staff who wrote the manual.
>
> Cary Millsap
> Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
> http://www.hotsos.com
> * Nullius in verba *
>
> Upcoming events:
> - Performance Diagnosis 101: 1/4 Calgary
> - SQL Optimization 101: 12/13 Atlanta
> - Hotsos Symposium 2005: March 6-10 Dallas
> - Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> On Behalf Of Alexandre Gorbatchev
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 7:52 AM
> To: Oracle-L_at_freelists.org
> Subject: log file sequential read - arguments P3
>
> Hi list.
> Does anybody know whether P2/P3 arguments for "log file sequential read"
> wait event are in database blocks or in log blocks?
> The manual is not clear but it seems to mean database block size. =
> However,=20
> I believe that it gotta be log block size. I couldn't find anything =
> useful=20
>
>
> on Metalink either.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
-- Best regards, Alex Gorbachev -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Dec 01 2004 - 14:55:21 CST
![]() |
![]() |