Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Toper variable question
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:35:07 -0000, Hallas, John, Tech Dev
<john.hallas_at_gb.vodafone.co.uk> wrote:
> Isn't the presence of modules one of the great exasberations (sp?) of =
> Perl
> One one hand there seems to be a module for everything, on the other you =
> need to be always down loading new modules.
The alternative would be a monolith.
You don't really want that, do you?
If setup PPM/CPAN so as to install dependant modules, it really isn't that big a deal to install modules.
>
> It amazes me that DBI does not as part of a standard install =
> (Activatestate at least).=20
They are always behind anyway. If possible, use a *nux box for the majority of your Perl work, you will be happier.
-- Jared Still Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 17:06:15 CST
![]() |
![]() |