Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: DEAD LOCK ???
Hmm...it looks like the info you've provided is incomplete.
Where did you get this? The output below looks like the output of a query, probably on V$LOCK. =20 The reason it looks incomplete is that while there is one "waiter" (sid 65), it doesn't appear to be blocked by anything. Note that there's only one line that shows a non-zero in the "REQUEST" column, which would indicate a waiting process. Further, it looks like sid 65 is waiting on a TX enqueue, where ID1=3D1730955 and ID2=3D547023, but there are no other sessions shown holding that enqueue. =20 So, why's 65 waiting, if no one else is blocking?
Bottom line, no, this doesn't look like a deadlock, but there's not enough info here to draw any real conclusions.
Please provide more detailed info as to your=20 situation, and how you arrived with the provided output. (The specific query executed would be helpful.)
-Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of BN
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:51 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: DEAD LOCK ???
>=20 >=20
>=20
>=20
> ADDR KADDR SID TY ID1 ID2 =20
> LMODE REQUEST CTIME BLOCK
> ---------------- ---------------- ----- -- ---------- ----------
> ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> 8000000100117958 8000000100117A98 65 TX 131135 738193 =20
> 6 0 926 0
> C00000003581EB38 C00000003581EB60 65 TM 35553 0 =20
> 3 0 926 0
> C00000003581DAD0 C00000003581DAF8 65 TM 79590 0 =20
> 3 0 926 0
> C000000033D60DC8 C000000033D60DE8 65 TX 1703955 547023 =20
> 0 4 920 0
> 8000000100117958 8000000100117A98 166 TX 458775 742661 =20
> 6 0 2285 0
> C000000035822ED0 C000000035822EF8 166 TM 35553 0 =20
> 3 0 2285 0
> C000000035819690 C0000000358196B8 166 TM 79582 0 =20
> 3 0 2284 0
>=20 >=20
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Nov 22 2004 - 10:20:29 CST
![]() |
![]() |