Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: CBC Latch contention in 10g
I believe Steve Adams once told me that the shareable latch feature is =
not
implemented on HP-UX.
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 10/26 Toronto, 1/4 Calgary
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Smiley John - IL
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:31 PM
To: 'Oracle-L (E-mail)'
Subject: CBC Latch contention in 10g
I'm seeing large numbers of CBC latch waits when many sessions (20-40) =
run
the same SELECT statement simultaneously (I can peek at v$session_wait =
and
catch this many sessions waiting on latch free: cache buffers chains for =
the
same sql_id).
CBC latch children have been sharable in read mode since 9i. I didn't =
see
any DML taking place at the same time that would cause these latches to =
be
taken in exclusive mode, so I'm wondering why they're blocking on the =
CBC
latches. I've examined the CBC latch children with the most sleeps and
examined the blocks on their hash chains and found exactly what I =
expected
to find: hot blocks on some of the tables referenced in the queries. =
But if
the latches are truly sharable for CR buffer gets, this shouldn't cause =
them
to pile up on the latch. Assuming delayed block cleanout isn't the =
problem,
what might explain this? I've searched MetaLink for latch related bugs =
in
10.1.0.2. No dice.=20
John Smiley
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Oct 19 2004 - 15:50:15 CDT
![]() |
![]() |