Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Problems w/ materialized view.....
So the problem is the select from vu_ttl_tlskwttl is at one point and =
time. The create materialized view is at another point in time. If =
anything changed in the underlying tables that made up the original =
view, you could get different counts back. The same would happen for a =
regular materialized view if the table it was based on continued to have =
inserts,updates, and deletes and you only refreshed the materilaized =
view once, then counted both.
I haven't found any related bugs with materilaized views on top of = views. It hasn't happened in my production environment either we we use = some of these.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Bobak, Mark
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 12:54 PM
To: Oracle-L Mailing List (E-mail 2)
Subject: Problems w/ materialized view.....
Anyone seen something like this before?
(Solaris8, Oracle 9.2.0.5, 64-bit EE)
SQL> select count(*) from vu_ttl_tlskwttl;
COUNT(*)
563360
create materialized view mvu_ttl_tlskwttl nologging as select * from = vu_ttl_tlskwttl;
Materialized view created.
SQL> select count(*) from mvu_ttl_tlskwttl;
COUNT(*)
540301
Now, vu_ttl_tlskwttl is a convential, non-materialized view. It's definition is the rather nasty looking: SELECT PMS.DBSB_ID,
DBPF.VP_ID, NVL(prmd.prmd_id, 0) prmd_id, NVL(prmd.vd_id,0) vd_id, pms.pms_display_flag, NVL (prmd.prmd_overwrite_pm_name, prmd.prmd_original_pm_name) = title_name, DECODE (prmd.prmd_issn,NULL,NULL,SUBSTR(prmd.prmd_issn, 1, = 4)||'-'||SUBSTR(prmd.prmd_issn, 5, 4)) issn, prmd.prmd_peer_review_flag, prmd.prmd_journal_code, NVL (prmd.prmd_external_id, 0) pq_pmid, DECODE( RTRIM( LTRIM(prmn.prmn_notes||';'||prmn1.prmn_notes)),';', '', RTRIM( LTRIM(DECODE(NVL(prmn.prmn_notes, '-'),'-', '', = prmn.prmn_notes || ';') || prmn1.prmn_notes))) notes, DECODE (pms.pms_new_title_flag,'Y','New = title',TLSFCTXT(prmd.prmd_id, dbpf.vp_id, 0) changes, NVL (pmd.vc_id, 0) vc_id, TO_CHAR(DECODE(pmd.pmd_overwrite_start_date,NULL,
TO_CHAR(DECODE(pmd.pmd_overwrite_end_date,NULL, tlsfucur (pmd.pmd_end_date,'ORIG', = prmd.prmd_coverage_ceased_flag, pmd.pmd_permission_expired_flag, 0), tlsfucur (pmd.pmd_overwrite_end_date, 'OVER', = prmd.prmd_coverage_ceased_flag, pmd.pmd_permission_expired_flag, 0) ),'MM/DD/YYYY') pmd_end_date, NVL(pmd_embargo_days, 0) embargo_days, TO_CHAR(DECODE (gps1.gps_start_date,NULL, gps2.gps_start_date, gps1.gps_start_date),'MM/DD/YYYY') gap_start_date, TO_CHAR(DECODE (gps1.gps_end_date,NULL, gps2.gps_end_date,gps1.gps_end_date),'MM/DD/YYYY') gap_end_date
FROM ttl_pm_subsets pms, ttl_db_platforms dbpf, ttl_print_medias prmd, ttl_print_media_comps pmd, ttl_gaps gps1, ttl_gaps gps2, ttl_pm_note_assignments pmna, -- for note from PRMD_id ttl_print_media_notes prmn, ttl_pm_note_assignments pmna1, -- for notes from PMS_id ttl_print_media_notes prmn1 WHERE pms.dbsb_id =3D dbpf.dbsb_id
AND gps2.gps_gap_type(+) =3D 'ORIG' AND prmd.prmd_id =3D pmna.prmd_id(+) AND pmna.prmn_id =3D prmn.prmn_id(+)
FROM ttl_print_media_comps = pmd1,ttl_valid_components vc WHERE pmd.prmd_id =3D pmd1.prmd_id AND pmd1.vc_id =
=3D vc.vc_id
and vc.vc_prog_alias=3D'CITATION') OR prmd.prmd_force_display_flag =3D 'Y' );
No, I didn't write it, just trying to understand it all gives me a = headache.
But, bottom line, I'm thinking this is a bug. Can anyone see any = circumstance by which this is not a bug?
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Oct 11 2004 - 17:46:48 CDT
![]() |
![]() |