Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Increase FREEIST w/o drop objects--sorry for the previous garbage code
Speaking of freelists, is checking v$segment_statistics for buffer busy =
waits a valid
indication of possibly needing more freelists? For example, the =
following buffer busy waits=20
occurring for the selected objects are the values are for one night of =
batch processing:
OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE VALUE ------------------------------ ------------------ ---------- ORDER_SHIP TABLE PARTITION 1106138 ORDER_SHIP TABLE PARTITION 1270775 SALES_ORDER TABLE PARTITION 1589732 SALES_ORDER TABLE PARTITION 1723766 ORDER_SHIP TABLE PARTITION 1935923 SALES_ORDER TABLE PARTITION 2411662 ORDER_SHIP TABLE PARTITION 2715558
Thanks,
Jeff T.
= =20
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Tanel P=F5der
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 4:42 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Increase FREEIST w/o drop objects--sorry for the previous =
garbage code
ASSM - Automatic segmnet space management.
There is no such thing as freelist for an ass-managed segment, free = space is managed using internal indexes and bitmaps within them in ASSM.
If interested in more, check =
http://integrid.info/Poder_Freelists_vs_ASSM.ppt for quick review..
Tanel.
> There are many site don't use the new features , like ASM. There are a =
> lot of ASM related bugs in metalink. So it is still meaningful to tune =
> freelists/groups even in 9i.
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Oct 04 2004 - 08:41:26 CDT
![]() |
![]() |