Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Can I tryst in "physical ... direct" figures?
As Terry points out, there could be a lot of sorting going on. Your figure would not be unreasonable (for example) in a data warehouse that was doing lots of 'Create table as select'/'report table'.
To increase confidence - you could cross-check these figures against the tablespace I/O figures. Direct writes are usually multiblock writes. Direct reads are usually multiblock reads - the tablespace (and file) stats will give you a further indication of what proportion of your reads and writes were direct.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept 19th
9.2.0.5 EE on Lintel RH AS 2.1
OLTP ~200 connections.
Today a have observed figures below in statspack report
Statistic Total per Second perTrans
physical reads 19,327,036 429.5 205.8 physical reads direct 10,482,393 232.9 111.6 physical writes 16,465,203 365.9 175.3 physical writes direct 16,343,723 363.2 174.0
It seams very strange to me that almost all writes and more then 1/2 of
reads is direct.
What do you think, can I trust on those figures? Can it be truth that all
writes are direct "bypassing the buffer cache, as written in Docs?
PS Report interval 750.02 (mins)
PS I know - SP aggregates live. Don't tell me do not look on it.
Jurijs
+371 9268222 (+2 GMT)
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Sep 24 2004 - 00:56:42 CDT
![]() |
![]() |