RE: Security Alert #68 - Have to upgrade versions prior to 9.2.0. 4

From: Alex <stant_98_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20040923175853.37143.qmail@web51810.mail.yahoo.com>

I am running 9.0.2.5 on Windows 2000 servers. Had no problems applying the patch on both lab and dev. boxes on primary and standby databases. The only thing is that the optach utility must be the latest one when installing the patch.

"Loughmiller, Greg" <greg.loughmiller_at_cingular.com> wrote: As of last Friday, the versions listed below have the security patch available for deployment....

8.1.7.4

9.0.1.4

9.0.1.5

9.0.4

9.2.0.4

9.2.0.5

10.1.0.2

Now the question becomes, which version/platform is the most stable for this patch? I have seen a few emails floating around where folks have had corruptions, crashes, and there have been several TAR's opened where the FAQ isn't solving the issue:-(.

greg

-----Original Message-----

From: Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us [mailto:Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 8:43 PM To: dwagoner_at_arsenaldigital.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: Security Alert #68 - Have to upgrade versions prior to 9.2.0.4

You mean before applying the upgrade for #68 you have to go to 9.2.0.5

first. I don't remember reading this can you provide a note number?

Thanks,

Paula

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org

[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of David Wagoner

Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 5:28 PM

To: ORACLE-L (E-mail)

Subject: Security Alert #68 - Have to upgrade versions prior to 9.2.0.4

According to the security alert, all Oracle versions below 9.2.0.4 have

be upgraded before applying the security patches. Looks like I have