Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: BIG database backup methods
I'm thinking a combo of both, but you know they want to eliminate those
extra disks. Not if we can avoid it.
I love RMAN, use it at another client exclusively, but at 1-2 TB and multiples on the same server, that "5 minute bounce, all backed up" is ever so nice. They can start the sync even a day or two early if we are in an "almost there" state... The client complete "the run", it looks good, 5 minute backup, start the next phase.
Now if we could COMBINE that with RMAN and archived backups would work very nicely, that would be good. But I'd fear a large restore could take hours.
Then again, when we had to rebuild an older shadow to get some data, that took 2-3 days. Not pretty.
Michael Kline
Database Administration
Outside 804.261.9446
Cell 804.744.1545
3-9446
-----Original Message-----
From: Carel-Jan Engel [mailto:cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:05 PM
To: Kline.Michael
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: BIG database backup methods
Just a thought: This HW-copying won't detect block corruptions. RMAN will. A problem can survive beyond repair with the syncing method.
Best regards,
Carel-Jan Engel
===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
===
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 20:11, Kline.Michael wrote:
We have the "luxury?" of being able to do shadow copies for many of our data warehouses. These are only in the 1-2 TB range, but with shadow copy, we start at perhaps 2AM with the syncing, and then around 4PM we stop the database, wait about 5 minutes, break the volumes and we're back up.
<http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Sep 21 2004 - 15:03:53 CDT
![]() |
![]() |