Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Solution to 100's of Oracle clients installed with Net8 and l ocal tnsnames.ora, sqlnet.ora
This (a shared, central TNSNAMES) is exactly what we've done since 7.3.
I've been told that Oracle doesn't support it, but we've never had a
problem. YMMV.
On the client: tns_admin=\\myserver\share_name
where \\myserver\share_name contains tnsnames.ora, sqlnet.ora. Has worked quite well for us.
Thanks
Ed Stevens
IBM Global Services
- Nissan North America, Smyrna Manufacturing Plant
IBM E-mail: Ed_Stevens_at_us.ibm.com
Nissan E-mail: ed.stevens_at_nmm.nissan-usa.com
voice: 615.355.2988 fax: 615.223.3510 pager: 615-252-0845
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse, Rich [mailto:Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:11 AM
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Solution to 100's of Oracle clients installed with Net8 and
local tnsnames.ora, sqlnet.ora
I'm fearing file locking issues with this approach. Multi-platform is = another issue, although a SAMBA/NFS combo on the "central location" = should take care of that.
Or are my fears unfounded? We're in the same boat, wondering what to do = about replacing the functionality of our replicated ONAMES servers for = the future. OiD 9.0.1 was not mature/stable enough to be production. = We haven't tested future versions and I don't plan to until the damnable = thing is at least free (i.e. included with our EE license).
Rich
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:32 AM
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Solution to 100's of Oracle clients installed with Net8 and
local tnsnames.ora, sqlnet.ora
[super snip]
However once I'd got this far, it did seem appropriate to wonder if it might not be better just to set TNS_ADMIN to a central location and just have the one copy.
--=20
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Sep 15 2004 - 16:02:53 CDT
![]() |
![]() |