Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Outer Joins are Evil?
I agree with Tim's comment back to you that "In short, first design the
"what" and then implement the "how", and don't confuse the order."
Good design /should/ take data access mechanisms into consideration but not, IMHO, attempt to avoid any such mechanisms entirely. If I don't want you to enter a dwelling through the front door, I can either build the dwelling without a front door or I can put a sign out front telling you to come around back. If I put up the sign, I suggest a normally desired path for you to take to enter, but I don't prohibit/eliminate the front door access path under all circumstances. Silly analogy maybe, but I think you get the idea. :)
Karen Morton
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
Upcoming events at http://www.hotsos.com/education/schedule.html
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of
ryan_gaffuri_at_comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 9:06 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Outer Joins are Evil?
when you design an oltp system do you take outer joins inter consideration and attempt to minimize them at the design level? tim gorman mentioned that he does not for datawarehouses.
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlReceived on Tue Aug 31 2004 - 11:55:55 CDT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
![]() |