Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: LiveReorg vs Oracle's online reorg capabilities
It's my turn today:
Do you have compelling evidence in favor of the notion that performing Oracle reorgs will actually help your business?
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 9/14 San Francisco, 10/5 Charlotte, 10/26
Toronto
- SQL Optimization 101: 8/16 Minneapolis, 9/20 Hartford, 10/18 New =
Orleans
- Hotsos Symposium 2005: March 6-10 Dallas
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Durinda.Jones
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:43 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: LiveReorg vs Oracle's online reorg capabilities
We are looking at Quest's LiveReorg to determine whether we want to go =
that
route for online reorgs or not. Has anyone else out there thought =
through
some of these issues? Trying to decide if it's worth the dollars or if
Oracle 9i will fit the bill. Quest gives you the nice front end to =
review
and build your jobs, but is that enough to pay for? I'm not finding a =
whole
lot of difference out there. Looks like the functionality is pretty
similar.
Pros/cons for either method (other than the $)?
Thanks for your help.
Durinda Jones
Yellow Technologies
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Aug 25 2004 - 15:58:38 CDT
![]() |
![]() |