Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re[4]: What Sort of Privilege?
Having started this hare running I better qualify those original
comments.
In principle, based on our experience of an un-disciplined user community, the one-schema approach has worked very well. We adopted this with version 5, so the subsequent enhancements in later versions of Oracle leaves me in little mood to re-engineer our architecture. (note - why is it, time after time after time, Oracle provides a solution to a problem we solved long ago? :-) )
Of course there is no reason why a multi-schema approach cannot work fine, but it requires a degree of advance planning and understanding to cover all those additional complexities which are simply absent from the one schema approach. So yes, Jackie - I think you guys have been careful!
So nobody is WRONG or RIGHT here, it is a question of understanding your environment, and choosing the most appropriate solution. Having said that, I am still more sympathetic to the position originally outlined, and endorsed so emphatically by Tom (thanks, Tom!).
peter
edinburgh
............
JB> Interesting - not something I've ever encountered. I have encountered JB> issues with indexing (the effects of the referencing columns not being JB> indexed, that is), but never with the number of schemas that referenced JB> it. Have I (and my co-workers) just been overly careful? JB> -----Original Message----- JB> From: Peter Robson [mailto:pgro_at_bgs.ac.uk]=20 JB> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:57 AM JB> To: Jackie Brock
JB> Whoa there everybody!
<skip)
--
mailto:pgro_at_bgs.ac.uk
![]() |
![]() |