RE: Index Rebuild Tuning

From: David Kurtz <info_at_go-faster.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:43:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CKEAJBMGFEOCDBFILPJDGEGEEIAA.info@go-faster.co.uk>

...and why isn't the table partitioned?
Even if the vendor tools won't support it, why can't you partition it manually?
BTW - which vendor?

regards

David Kurtz
Go-Faster Consultancy Ltd.

tel: +44 (0)7771 760660
fax: +44 (0)7092 348865
web: www.go-faster.co.uk

mailto:david.kurtz_at_go-faster.co.uk
Book: PeopleSoft for the Oracle DBA: http://www.psftdba.com PeopleSoft DBA Forum: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/psftdba

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Fuad Arshad Sent: 19 August 2004 14:07
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Index Rebuild Tuning

Scenario
1.8 Billion rows table non partitioned. index key 30 bytes
parallel 8 on index parallel 2 on table Oracle 9.2.0.4
Workarea_size set to manual sort_area_size set to 100M

Tablespace locally managed non assm

The table is not partitioned because of vendor requirement the rebuild is taking 12 hrs and is still runing .

need help tuning this rebuidl
it is not an online rebuild.
we are doing migration testing on a test box. even though production is 2wice as faster
thisis not acceptable with the users.
need advise.
the index size is around 57G

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

Received on Thu Aug 19 2004 - 10:39:29 CDT