Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Is RAC DOA?
Individual patches are now being marked as rolling upgradeable (damn that's=
an awful phrase!) I think that's what Raj means.
=
Pete
=
"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
=
"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!" Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] =
On Behalf Of Jesse, Rich
Sent: Tuesday, 17 August 2004 4:16 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
Any specific cases you could mention? This has been one of the sore =3D spots for us with RAC.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: Is RAC DOA?
Not true in call cases ...
Raj
--- "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com> wrote:
> I'll add that until <buzzword>hetergeneous clusters</buzzword> are =3D
supported, your availability
> is only good until your next patch (Oracle, OS, or 3rd party). When =3D
you patch one, you most
> likely need to patch all at the same time. In the case of Oracle =3D
patches, it's mandatory at
> least thru 9.2.
> Rich
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Aug 16 2004 - 13:17:50 CDT
![]() |
![]() |