Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 10g on Linux
I usually wait for the 1st patchset because it, under most circumstances,
fixes horrible bugs of the first release that cause database corruption
and/or instance failure. Stability is usually good after the 1st patchset,
that is my experience. Of course, there are patchsets, like 9.2.0.5 that
mess things up a bit, probably just to bring some change into our, otherwise
very boring and predictable, lives. As I've stated earlier, I'm a definite
example of the "1st patchset bigot" and I do intend to continue being one.
-- Mladen Gogala Oracle DBA email:mladeng_at_aetvn.com Ext: 9787Received on Thu Aug 12 2004 - 10:20:02 CDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JApplewhite_at_austin.isd.tenet.edu
> [mailto:JApplewhite_at_austin.isd.tenet.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 11:15 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: 10g on Linux
>
>
> First Patchset Bigots? How about Terminal Patchset Bigots,
> like me? We've
> been moving our databases from 8i to 9i since 9.2.0.4 came
> out. No rush,
> since our COTS Student Information and Financials apps could just as
> easily use Oracle7 for all their sophistication.
>
> I prefer stability to "cool new features".
---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
![]() |