| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Query works fine in 8i and not in 9i
Hello all,
Thanks to all that replied. I'm in the process of moving our PeopleSoft Financials from SUN (8i) to HP-UX (9i). The optimizer seems to have a mind of its own in 9i. By PeopleSoft suggestion, I have added the following init.ora parameters that seem to have done the trick:
_complex_view_merging=3DFALSE
_unnest_subquery=3DFALSE
Thanks.
Abraham Guerra
Oracle DBA
American Family Insurance
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Breitling
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 1:49 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Query works fine in 8i and not in 9i
Yes, I seem to get posts in a rather erratic order, often receiving the=20
answers before the question. I received the original post to this
follow-up=20
queue by now, but still not Mark's.
Although all posts seem to eventually make it.
At 10:52 AM 8/11/2004, you wrote:
>You must have missed Mark F's post where he said that doing a 10053
trace
>could be called 'doing a Wolfgang'. We can add a Cary to the mix too.
>
>Ruth
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com=20
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Aug 11 2004 - 14:06:25 CDT
 |
 |