Re: Re[1] : "SET UID" not set for oracle executable ?

From: <J.Velikanovs_at_alise.lv>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:33:09 +0300
Message-ID: <OFCDC13401.3B7BE7DF-ONC2256EEC.004F6DEC-C2256EEC.004FF256@alise.lv>

Prem do not rush to change ID-s.
One question here: Which user you are trying to use for startup DB? As far as I know, there are practise to use not ORACLE users for DB within eBS environments.
I recall the files owner is dev.. user, from your prev. postings. Who is ownere of Oracle software?
Can you try to startup db using dev.. user ?

Jurijs
+371 9268222 (+2 GMT)

---

Thank you for teaching me.
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html

On 10.08.2004 17:23:59 oracle-l-bounce wrote:

>Thanks Mladen / Mark.
>does it mean that root.sh has not been run ?!
>if SET-UID is not set , oracle executable does
>not have the permission to write to DBF files ( as
>a metalink note says ) .
>
>But i wonder , how it was working so far ( almost
>for 3-4 months ) . i face the problem since yesterday
>only . couldn't get the reason why ? And why with
>that one particular file ONLY ?!!
>
>Can someone enlighen me .
>
>Thanks and Regards,
>Prem.

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tue Aug 10 2004 - 09:31:17 CDT