Re[2]: standards

MT> --- Rachel Carmichael <wisernet100_at_yahoo.com> wrote: MT> ...
>> One thing I've finally decided is fairly useless is
>> the idea, within
>> naming standards, of identifying the type of object
>> by a prefix. Who
>> cares?
>>

But 'identifying the type of object by a' SUFFIX is entirely different - best thing we ever did (well, one of them...)

peter
edinburgh

-- 
    mailto:pgro_at_bgs.ac.uk



*********************************************************************
This  e-mail  message,  and  any  files  transmitted  with  it, are
confidential  and intended  solely for the  use of the  addressee. If
this message was not addressed to  you, you have received it in error
and any  copying,  distribution  or  other use  of any part  of it is
strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
of the sender and do not necessarily represent  those of the British
Geological  Survey. The  security of e-mail  communication  cannot be
guaranteed and the BGS accepts no liability  for claims arising as a
result of the use of this medium to  transmit messages from or to the
BGS. .                            http://www.bgs.ac.uk
*********************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------