Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Transaction table- Keep Pool
Um, Niall...
0.01s =3D 1 centisecond
0.001s =3D 1 millisecond
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 8/10 Boston, 9/14 San Francisco, 10/5 =
Charlotte
- SQL Optimization 101: 7/26 Washington DC, 8/16 Minneapolis, 9/20 =
Hartford
- Hotsos Symposium 2005: March 6-10 Dallas
- Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Niall Litchfield
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 4:06 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Transaction table- Keep Pool
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:18:40 +0100, Niall Litchfield
<niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Well your *max* wait for disk IO is 4cs and your average IO service
> time is 2cs. EMC will be doing well to significantly improve on that
milliseconds not centiseconds - a half second read would be bad news = indeed.
memo to self
0.1s =3D centisec
0.01s =3D millisec
maybe binary was easier after all.
--=20
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Aug 06 2004 - 16:11:47 CDT
![]() |
![]() |