Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
I still haven't seen anyone own up to analyzing SYS tables. Sure seems
like someone has.
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On
Behalf Of Tanel P=F5der
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 6:21 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
I think at least some of the performance problems which have occurred after analyzing DD, are caused by the usual migration-to-CBO problems, such as incorrect optimizer_* parameters, etc..
Tanel.
> Hi Michael,
> thanks for disagreeing with me ;-)
> is this an apps environment, by any chance?
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ********************************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,=20 distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system. Thank You. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Thu Jul 29 2004 - 18:26:39 CDT
![]() |
![]() |