Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Undocumented data dictionary views
Boivin,
I think this is very different types of things.
One is C code, which is compiled, and no one have access to it source.
Then Oracle can introduce hidden parameters, which affect code behaviour.
Second - SQL code, which can be accessed normally. And easily dropped then
code goes to production. Is there any usefulness from view, which give
information about unrealized features?
Jurijs
9268222
"Boivin, Patrice J" <BoivinP_at_mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
27.07.2004 13:07
Please respond to oracle-l
To: "'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> cc: Subject: RE: Undocumented data dictionary views
Just curious. Someone asked about an undocumented view that lists all the errors and I followed the train of thought.
Oracle puts parameters that are in progress, or about to be desupported as undocumented parameters. Some of them are used by Technical Support I think.
I was wondering if they do the same thing with data dictionary views, or
if
that is pretty much fixed and they introduce them all suddenly when a new
version is released.
They do introduce new views from version to version, I was thinking maybe precursors of those might exist in the previous version.
Doesn't sound like it.
It makes sense that they wouldn't -- after all, I imagine there is a
(slight) performance hit involved in maintaining data dictionary views.
They probably lump them all into the next version's beta and test them
there
through their partners.
I know about the base tables and X$ tables.
Pat.
![]() |
![]() |