RE: Undocumented data dictionary views

From: Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak_at_il.proquest.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:51:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4C9B6FDA0B06FE4DAF5918BBF0AD82CF09660C4E@bosmail00.bos.il.pqe>

Sure, all the base data dictionary tables are undocumented, for = starters.....ts$, fet$, uet$, tab$, col$, etc, etc.

Also, there are undocumented views.....SYS.SYS_DBA_SEGS is an example of = that. Then of course, there are all the X$ tables......

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Boivin, Patrice J Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 11:35 AM
To: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: Undocumented data dictionary views

There are undocumented parameters (_xxxx), are there undocumented data dictionary views? (_dba_xxxx).

Patrice.

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/

FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com


----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org

put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

---

Received on Tue Jul 27 2004 - 10:49:43 CDT