Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
Data warehouses usually require using PQO, and this uses direct reads
that will benefit nothing of big buffer cache.
Regards,
Waleed
-----Original Message-----
From: Hemant K Chitale [mailto:hkchital_at_singnet.com.sg]=20
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:32 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: About having a large SGA for a DataWarehouse
At my site we'll be migrating a [currently very small 20GB] Corporate=20
DataWarehouse
from 32-bit 8.1.7 Solaris to 32-bit 9i Linux. It will grow rapidly with
Manufacturing Datamarts
to probably 500GB in a year.
Some of the DataMart teams are pushing for a very large SGA while I
would=20
rather have a
large PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET [not using 10g and Automatic Memory
Management]
My rebuttal was :
We must consider how large we really need the SGA. A too large SGA
[assuming that it is not too large as to cause excessive Paging and
begin=20
Swapping at the OS level]
can result in :
Comments / Recommendations / Corrections from this list, please ?
Hemant K Chitale
Oracle 9i Database Administrator Certified Professional
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital
"A man's reputation is what other people think of him; his character is=20
what he really is."
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlput 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
![]() |
![]() |