Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: to_number question (excellent thread)

Re: to_number question (excellent thread)

From: Daniel Fink <Daniel.Fink_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:30:52 -0600
Message-id: <40F83AFC.5030304@sun.com>


Umm...I did not really intend it to be humorous... (don't worry, no offense taken)

In my current and past research and daily tasks, I am encountering all 3 classifications. My first exposure to this was my work on rollback segments. I quickly realized that there was a lot of mythology and lack of understanding, strongly supported by documentation, papers and presentations. When I really dove in to 9i Automatic Undo, it was reinforced.

Have a good weekend,
Daniel

Jonathan Gennick wrote:
> Friday, July 16, 2004, 3:44:19 PM, Daniel Fink (Daniel.Fink_at_Sun.COM) wrote:
> DF> I might add that there are three classifications on reality
> DF> 1) how you want it to work
> DF> 2) how the masses believe it to work
> DF> 3) how it really works
>
> LOL! That's great Daniel. I love that. Great Friday
> afternoon humor, and I badly needed a good laugh today.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jonathan Gennick --- Brighten the corner where you are
> http://Gennick.com * 906.387.1698 * mailto:jonathan@gennick.com



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Jul 16 2004 - 15:27:58 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US