Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Determining char/varchar2 column length
> That's correct, but version determines how you can calculate it to begin
> with.
> In 8i, data_length would be set to "30" (which is the byte_length), but
> if you're using a multibyte character set, the actual number of
> characters that can be stored there will vary. (e.g., 30 US7ASCII
One minor addition, with *variable width* multibyte charsets, yes this can vary, with fixed width it will be fixed how many bytes a char takes.
> characters, but say only 10 multibyte Japanese characters).
>
> In 9i, the nls_length_semantics allows one to specify how Oracle treats
> the length specified during table definition. Using "byte" semantics,
> it acts the same as 8i. Using "char" semantics, however, data_length no
> longer reflects the length specified in the column definition, but
> rather calculates this length (the actual number of bytes needed) using
> the database character set. For UTF8, this is typically three-times the
> actual length specified in the column definition.
Btw, this is an important point, that nls_length_semanics affects only table column (and possibly type) definitions, but no PL/SQL datatypes for example. A client of mine had problems after migrating to UTF8 w. character nls length semantics, PL/SQL variables were still defined in byte lengths..
>
> So, the idea is we want a query to say "here's the value specified in
> the table create statement" for the length of that column. Whereas in
> 8i we could query data_length, in 9i data_length does /not/ always
> reflect this value. Rather, it's stored in char_length, a field that
> does not exist in 8i.
I'm not sure whether I understand your question, but check whether CHAR_COL_DECL_LENGTH column in DBA_TAB_COLUMNS helps you.
Tanel.
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Jul 14 2004 - 16:01:03 CDT
![]() |
![]() |