Re: L2 cache vs. faster processor

From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:03:10 +0300
Message-ID: <008901c469dd$99443710$63a423d5@porgand>

Are you sure that 3GHz ones are without any L2 cache? I'd definitely go with 2.8GHz ones with L2 cache in this case...

Tanel.

> A client is ordering hardware for an Oracle on Linux system, and has to
choose between 2.8 GHz Xeon processors with 1MB L2 cache and 3.06 GHz Xeon processors (no L2 cache). Does anyone have any recommendations on the value of L2 cache vs. a faster processor?
> --Terry
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wed Jul 14 2004 - 15:02:23 CDT