Re: Hot indexes

From: Mogens Nørgaard <mln_at_miracleas.dk>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:04:12 +0200
Message-ID: <40F245FC.5060209@miracleas.dk>

Oops, yes, that's what I meant. We need the 10046 level 28 option (12+16), don't we? :-).

Tanel Põder wrote:

>
> You probably meant tracking PIO calls here, since v$session_wait and 10046
> trace arent able to report LIOs in detailed level. If one wanted to track
> LIOs, event 10200 could be used. But as you said, it would generate huge
> amounts of trace, probably 42TB in this case :)
>
> Tanel.

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Mon Jul 12 2004 - 03:00:48 CDT